What is institutional real estate?
Institutional real estate can be classified as high-quality commercial properties that are usually congregated in large investment portfolios managed professionally on behalf of third-party owners or beneficiaries.
Who are institutional investors?
Institutional investors include public and corporate pension funds, endowments and foundations, life insurance companies, commercial banks, real estate investment trusts, sovereign wealth funds, among other financial entities.
How big is the institutional real estate market?
The commercial real estate marketplace in the
United States currently is estimated at $4.0
trillion. The market capitalization of equity
real estate investment trusts (REIT) was approximately
$389 billion at year-end 2010.
Is real estate primarily an equity vehicle or an income vehicle?
Traditionally, pension funds have viewed real estate as a relatively high-income-producing asset class with equity characteristics, and underwriting has focused primarily on assessing the quality or sustainability of cash flow. Over the past several years, many investors have been changing their perspectives, viewing real estate now as more of an equity asset class with better-than-average income characteristics.
As more and more pension funds begin to pay out more cash to beneficiaries (i.e., pensioners) than they are receiving in annual contributions, they can be expected to become much more income-oriented so that they will be in a better position to fund those negative cash flows without having to liquidate assets. Because of its inherent potential for generating relatively high cash distributions, we would expect pension funds to continue to view real estate as an income-producing asset with equity characteristics.
Who are the largest pension fund real estate advisers?
Some of the largest investment advisers include
J.P. Morgan Asset Management, LaSalle Investment
Management, Prudential Real Estate Investors,
Morgan Stanley Real Estate and CB Richard Ellis
Investors. We sell a semi-annual listing of
the top
real estate advisers (ranked by tax-exempt assets
under management) for $65. Another great
resource is the Money
Market Directory of Pension Funds and their Investment
Managers (published by Standard & Poor's
for about $1,500). IREI's sponsor firms and advertisers
include the biggest real estate investment advisory
firms in the United States as well as worldwide;
check out the sponsor
interviews and profiles
on our website to learn more about these firms.
What are the general trends in real estate portfolio management?
The most important trend is an awareness that it exists as a profession, and that its practice is important. Most of the 1980s and 1990s were dedicated to the assembly of portfolios. While assembling portfolios is still a concern, especially with the global competition for good properties at attractive prices, the need to manage portfolios prudently also has become important. The primary role of a portfolio manager is to help define portfolio objectives, and then to construct and manage the portfolio so as to achieve those objectives at the lowest tolerable level of risk.
What's the difference between portfolio management, asset management and property management?
A portfolio manager is responsible for a portfolio of assets and typically operates for the benefit of a third party. Portfolio managers tend to operate at the strategic level, focusing on the development or clarification of portfolio risk and return objectives, on the construction and strategic management of portfolios, and on the monitoring of both market conditions and portfolio performance within the context of overall portfolio objectives.
Asset managers and property managers tend to focus more on tactics, i.e., on the implementation of portfolio strategy. Asset managers typically report to portfolio managers and work through third-party property managers, who report to the asset managers. Asset managers, therefore, are focused on managing collections of assets (as opposed to portfolios) and often are regionally focused. Their primary objective is to coordinate the activities of local property management personnel toward the achievement of the portfolio strategies established by the portfolio managers to whom they report.
Property managers typically are responsible for managing the day-to-day operations at the property level, either full-time on-site at one property or for a collection of properties within a specified submarket, market or region. Duties usually include leasing and property operations (maintenance, engineering, tenant relationships, on-site construction management, property-level accounting or data entry, and such). Property managers either report to portfolio managers (in vertically integrated companies) or to asset managers (in companies that are not vertically integrated).
What are the hot issues right now in the industry?
Amid the current credit crisis and economic recession, commercial real estate markets are characterized by property value losses, rising foreclosures and reduced property revenues. Participants at one our recent editorial advisory board meetings identified the following topical issues.
The Economy: What impact will the decline in
employment, consumer spending and inflation both at home and abroad have on the outlook for real estate investment over the near and long haul?
The Credit Crunch: How long do you think it
will be before real estate activity is back
on track? When equity capital does begin to
flow again, how significant will those flows
be, and why?
Foreign Affairs: Global political
risks appear to escalating. How will the upcoming
change in the U.S. presidency affect foreign
investment risks, if at all? Are overseas markets
overheating? If so, where are the trouble spots
most likely first to appear? What opportunities
exist in the growing global public REIT sector?
Oil: Higher oil prices, cheaper labor and
higher savings rates around the world are
creating huge capital surpluses surpluses that remain mainly in the hands of nations whose political agendas differs markedly from that of the United States. What are the implications for geographic asset allocation?
Asset Allocation: Because returns for all
asset classes are down, are any plan sponsors
considering altering targets for the various
asset classes? If we continue to receive disappointing
news from the real estate sector, will plan
sponsors trim their commitments to the asset
class?
Risks/Opportunities: Where are we on
the pendulum of pricing risk in today’s market? Where do the best risk-adjusted investment opportunities lie today: in real estate equity or debt?
Commitments: Will plan sponsors increase
the dollar volume of investment commitments to
U.S.-focused fund offerings in 2011? How about
internationally focused fund offerings? Staffing:
Will “manager/adviser compression” continue
to take place over the next five years? And
if so, what implications will this have for
newer, smaller, emerging investment management
firms?
Consultants: What will the consultant
of the future look like, and what new services
should they provide?
Benchmarks: The predominant
benchmark for U.S. institutional investors
remains based on the NCREIF Property Index
(NPI). In the opinion of many, the NPI does
not represent the composition of most portfolios,
particularly private market closed-end fund
portfolios. What is the appropriate benchmark,
and is it being used to evaluate both outside
manager and internal staff? What are the trends
in compensation structure for investment staff,
particularly senior investment staff, and how
are they affected by benchmark selection?
Fees/Fund
Terms: How concerned are investors that the
management fee load for most closed-end funds
(typically 100 basis points to 150 basis points
per year) looks so dilutive to returns particularly
now that you can almost guarantee that funds
will fail to achieve their stated performance
targets?
Capacity: Will the top 10 largest
advisers of the future be required to be full-service
global providers, with capacity to do both
REIT and equity investments? Or can more focused
managers still compete for the limited room
at the top?
Debt: There seems to be a surplus
of distressed debt offerings in the markets
today. To what extent does the supply of capital
being raised for distressed debt investing
meet or exceed the opportunity?
Infrastructure: Will more institutional investors gravitate
to this capital-starved asset class? How do
you properly evaluate the opportunities and
the inherent risks and returns?
Will consolidation in the investment advisory industry continue?
Yes. Consolidation the drive toward greater efficiency is a primary force in life and can be expected to continue for some time. Following a period of strong real estate performance that produced a proliferation of advisory firms and investment vehicles, the current credit crunch and pullback in available investment capital will cause some firms to fail or to seek financial partners through recapitalization or acquisition.
What are the risk and return expectations of pension funds investing directly in equity real estate?
For our pension fund readers, the hottest issues
include:
- how to integrate public and private
real estate investment portfolio strategies
into a cohesive overall strategy consistent
with and supportive of their overall investment
portfolio strategy;
- how to add global real
estate investment to their portfolio management
strategy;
- how to capitalize, without taking
undue risk, on arbitrage opportunities that
might be presenting themselves in the markets,
such as the present public-to-private opportunities
available in the REIT industry;
- how to improve
alignments of interests with advisers, consultants
and other service providers;
- how to continue
to grow their investment portfolios, without
a disproportionate increase in staffing;
- how to reduce the overall cost of portfolio
administration;
- and, as always, how to fund
their liabilities at the lowest possible overall
risk.
For investment advisory and opportunistic fund
managers, the hottest issue is how to survive
and grow their firms in an increasingly dynamic
environment and in the face of ever-changing
investor expectations and requirements. Should
they sell, acquire another firm, allow their
firm to be acquired, remain private, build a
securities management capability, go international
or go public are paramount issues in many advisers'
minds, not to mention the prospect of how to
properly price and compete with other players
for new acquisitions on the margins, while ensuring
best execution on the disposition side of the
equation.
For our REIT readers, there are different
issues. For the largest REITs, it's how can
they achieve and sustain market dominance,
with all of the economies of scale, efficiencies
and superior access to lower cost capital that
it provides. For the mid-sized REITs, it's
how can they achieve the critical mass necessary
to compete for dominance within their market
niches. For the smaller REITs, it's how can
they survive without being subjected to a hostile
takeover bid from a larger, better capitalized
company or investor group. And for the smallest
REITs, it's how can they continue to operate
quietly undisturbed, under the radar screen,
until they can figure out what their next steps
should be. How to sustain continued growth
in earnings and shareholder value remains at
the top of every REIT executive's list, as
does how the current wave of public-to-private
acquisitions will continue to affect the industry.
For
REIT investment managers, the primary issue
is how to increase market share of the tax-exempt
investment market, while continuing to produce
competitive returns. Other concerns are how
to broaden distribution channels to reach ever-broader
constituencies (for tax-exempt advisers, the
issue would be how to access individual investors;
for mutual fund managers, the issue would be
how to access the tax-exempt investor markets;
for all managers, the issue is how to develop
market share in the exploding defined-contribution
pension marketplace).
What's the impact of the Internet on the real estate investment business?
Given the geometric increase in the amount of information that is now available to investors and the further geometric increases almost certain to come, it will become harder and harder for firms to differentiate themselves.
Access to low-cost information and low-cost technological tools to analyze that information will reduce size advantages and make it easier for smaller firms to compete with larger firms. The emergence of buyer clubs will provide some of the same economies of scale in purchasing once available only to the largest players in the markets. Smaller players, therefore, may be able to occupy niches at much less risk than larger players.
Relationships will continue to be important;
but relationships are built on mutual trust and
respect. Mutual trust and respect are built on
doing what you say you are going to do, and on
consistently meeting or exceeding expectations.
Consistently meeting or exceeding expectations
relies upon knowledge and skill. So knowledge
and skill will continue to be critical weapons
in the battle for market share or, more importantly,
share of mind.
What are the risk and return expectations
of pension funds investing directly in equity
real estate?
Most investors in "core" properties (i.e.,
high-quality, stable, income-producing office,
industrial, multifamily and retail properties)
expect to receive around 8 percent to 9 percent
on their unleveraged real estate investments. If
they leverage, they tend to leverage assets between
5 percent and 60 percent, with average portfolio
leverage ranging between 20 percent and 40 percent.
Leveraged return expectations for core real estate
investments, therefore, range between 10 percent
and 15 percent. Some investors are beginning to
look at the private markets as a high-yield investment
alternative and, therefore, they demand and expect
higher returns from their real estate investment
portfolios. Investors expect value-added investment
returns of between 12 percent and 15 percent and
opportunistic returns in excess of 18 percent to
20 percent. Most of these investors expect their
portfolios to be highly leveraged.
Many of the larger investors have both core and high-yield investment components
within their portfolios and, therefore, have different risk/return expectations,
depending upon the strategy for each portion of the portfolio. Some investors
focus only on core strategies, others only on high-yield.
Are pension funds interested in international investing?
Yes, definitely! Interest in international investing
is increasing. Surveys of the tax-exempt plan
sponsor community conducted by Institutional
Real Estate, Inc. in conjunction with Kingsley
Associates show that, year after year, pension
funds plan to increase their foreign holdings;
now, two-thirds of plan sponsor respondents
indicate they are currently invested in or
are considering investing in foreign real estate.
The bulk of these investments will consist
of private equity investments made via pooled
funds that target specific markets. The most
popular countries include more mature markets
such as the United Kingdom, Japan and the Western
European markets, as well as emerging markets,
such as Brazil, China and India.
What are some of the factors that are reshaping the supply and demand dynamics in commercial real estate?
Demographic changes will continue to have a dramatic
impact on both the make-up of the available
workforce and the needs of space users. The
two most significant challenges will be anticipating
the implications of an aging baby boomer population which
may make traditional viewpoints of supply and
demand dynamics for certain property types
obsolete and the implications of the
surge in immigration, particularly among Hispanic
and Asian populations.
Equally important, strategists and investors will need to respond to the challenge of continued institutionalization and globalization of real estate. This has implications for how capital is formed, accessed and deployed, how customers are serviced, and how entities must be organized as well.
Where can I find a recent salary survey of the institutional real estate investment industry?
Each year Ferguson
Partners Ltd. in Chicago conducts
a compensation survey for the entire real estate
industry; it covers practices at advisory firms
as well as other segments of the industry (312)
368-5040. Also the National
Association of Real Estate Investment Managers has
survey results available free to its members;
the executive compensation survey is available
for sale to non-NAREIM members.