Institutional Real Estate Europe
August 1, 2008: Vol. 2, Number 8Buy For $150.00 Add to Cart
Playing the Markets
Commercial property investors have enjoyed a golden age during the past five years, with double-digit price appreciation in many markets a near guarantee and risk seemingly suspended — conditions were never better and capital flowed into the asset class at unprecedented rates. Demand was so great, in fact, that several countries, including Germany and the United Kingdom, opened new property securities markets to satisfy clamouring investors.
In 2006, when Gensler published the Faulty Towersreport, we were anticipating the introduction of Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs). They were a requirement of the European Union (under the Energy Performance for Buildings Directive) and were expected to be introduced in the United Kingdom early that year. The Gensler report surveyed the opinions of 100 property professionals, half of whom were property developers, the others investment managers of large portfolios.
A World of Difference
It is commonly presumed that the trade-off between risk and return provided by both direct real estate investments and real estate funds is approximately linear — in other words, that the marginal return per unit of risk is broadly stable at all levels of risk. This concept is illustrated in the chart below. Fund marketing documents often use this approach to illustrate the risk and return choices available to real estate investors.
Shop Talk: A Conversation with Amit Mathur
Fitch Ratings is one of the Big Three ratings agencies that take on the task of categorising debt. This task has assumed great significance in recent years, and the credit crunch has placed the ratings industry further in the spotlight. Editor Richard Fleming recently talked with Amit Mathur,senior director in Fitch Ratings’ Fund and Asset Manager Rating Group, based in London, about the impact of the present market situation and how real estate investment managers should react.